Va College Quest

Back to previous page

Students with Disabilities and Access to Community Colleges:
Continuing Issues and New Directions


By Carmen Rioux-Bailey, Ed.S.

INTRODUCTION
GUIDING QUESTIONS
Issues to Explore Regarding the Purpose of Community College as a Postsecondary Option
Issues to Explore Regarding the Differences Between an IDEA Environment and an ADA/504 Environment
Issues to Explore Regarding Admission and Enrollment Procedures
Issues to Explore Regarding Tuition, Expenses, and Funding
Issues to Explore Regarding Disability Services and Supports on Campus
STRATEGIES FOR STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES AND THEIR SUPPORTERS
Strategies for Students
Strategies for Family Members
Strategies for Secondary Educators
EMERGING TRENDS AND ISSUES FOR COMMUNITY COLLEGES THAT MAY IMPACT STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
BIBLIOGRAPHY AND REFERENCES

INTRODUCTION

Much has been written for students with disabilities, their family members, and educators about community college as a postsecondary option. This information typically focuses on the differences between high school and community college, such as differences in legislative protections and various ways to access auxiliary aids and services. Yet many students, family members, and educators remain uninformed about the questions they should be asking about the transition from high school to community college programs; the policies that determine admittance to, and continued enrollment in, community college programs; and the strategies and resources that may impact successful outcomes.

Many students with disabilities choose community college programs over four year colleges as their first or only postsecondary education experience (Savukinas, 2003). Recent research indicates that two-year institutions tend to offer more varied and specialized services that focus on serving students with disabilities, and that these programs educate and train students with a wider variety of disabilities, and maintain and provide stronger community linkages than do four-year institutions (Chang & Logan, 2002). Still, not all community colleges offer the same services or have the same policies regarding access and enrollment. It is important that students with disabilities and their supporters ask the right questions when investigating community colleges in order to make informed decisions.

Community colleges have traditionally served the most diverse groups of students with the most diverse educational goals. Such programs currently account for 44% of all undergraduate enrollment (both in two and four-year institutions) nationwide (Phelan, 2000). As the importance of postsecondary education increases, so does the range of programs and course offerings available. Students with disabilities need to be clear on what they hope to accomplish during their community college experience, and for what purposes they are pursuing education after high school.

The role of community colleges in the broader educational and workforce landscape is always adapting and expanding, frequently in response to current employment trends and changing demands of the workplace. Further, cooperative agreements and collaborative activities between state and local workforce development entities and education agencies create new directions and policies that may affect the participation of students with disabilities on the community college campus. It is important that students, families, educators, and leaders from different community spheres attend to these emerging directions in order to take advantage of new opportunities or address potential barriers to participation.

This article supplies guiding questions, clarifying notes, and strategies for students with disabilities and their supporters (including family members and secondary educators) to assist them in becoming informed consumers or service providers as they pursue their investigation of community colleges as postsecondary education options. The article concludes by identifying emerging trends and issues that may serve as new directions for community colleges and that have the potential to affect the participation of students with disabilities.

GUIDING QUESTIONS

Issues to Explore Regarding the Purpose of Community College as a Postsecondary Option

Issues to Explore Regarding the Differences Between an IDEA Environment and an ADA/504 Environment

Issues to Explore Regarding Admission and Enrollment Procedures

Issues to Explore Regarding Tuition, Expenses, and Funding

How can I pay for tuition and expenses? Are there any disability-related supports besides regular financial aid avenues?

Issues to Explore Regarding Disability Services and Supports on Campus

STRATEGIES FOR STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES AND THEIR SUPPORTERS

Strategies for Students

Strategies for Family Members

Strategies for Secondary Educators


EMERGING TRENDS AND ISSUES FOR COMMUNITY COLLEGES THAT MAY IMPACT STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

Community colleges are spending more and more of their budgets on remedial education and may seek alternatives in order to maintain fiscal accountability and strengthen degree attainment rates.

Approximately 63% of students at two-year postsecondary institutions take remedial courses (College and Career Transitions Initiative, 2003). Students with disabilities take a higher percentage of remedial or developmental courses than other student groups. Research by the Education Commission of the States (2002) shows that 25% of students who must take remedial courses fail to complete all their remedial coursework. Less than half of students who took remedial coursework attained a two or four-year degree by the time they were thirty. With funding increasingly tied to accountability measures such as degree attainment, community colleges may try to reduce the amount of students in need of remediation by requiring a standard high school diploma or GED (Savukinas, 2003). Some community colleges are experimenting with outsourcing remedial education to specialized private tutoring vendors (Phelan, 2000).

Transition programs for students with disabilities ages 18-21 are increasing on community college campuses.

According to Grigal, Neubert, and Moon (2001), students with more significant disabilities, especially those with intellectual disabilities who require extensive educational support services, have typically remained in public school settings until they "age out" of their entitlement to services under IDEA. Many of these students and their families have advocated for continued inclusive opportunities in different settings for the post-high school years of 18-21. Encouraged by inclusive philosophies and systems change grants, public schools have approached community colleges about providing opportunities for these students to receive their public school instruction on the campus. The local education agency usually provides the funding, transportation, and instructors, while the community college provides space and an inclusive environment. The students (although not officially admitted to the college) have access to peers without disabilities, classes (in some cases community college classes are available for auditing or credit), and work experiences in a more age-appropriate environment. A database of Community-Based Transition Programs for students ages 18-21 can be found on the Transition Coalition's website: www.transitioncoalition.org

Dual enrollment for students with and without disabilities will increasingly be an option to promote the transition from high school to postsecondary education.

There is increasing emphasis on K-16 education rather than K-12 education. Policymakers are interested in streamlining linkages between public schools and community colleges and promoting more seamless transitions for students to access postsecondary education and gain career and technical skills. The impact of accountability standards in education is more accurately measured when tests, requirements, and outcome data are aligned across educational systems. Dual enrollment, where students remain enrolled in high school while accessing community college coursework, is one way to expose students to the opportunities and demands of a postsecondary environment while they are still in secondary education. The Education Commission of the States (2000, p. 3) postulates that dual enrollment can better prepare high school students for college coursework, expose them to motivating coursework including career and technical programs that may be unavailable at the high school, help students progress more quickly through their college educations, make their high school experience more productive, and help to bridge gaps between high school and college.

Many youth and young adults with disabilities qualify for WIA services through One-Stop Career Centers. Community colleges are often key partners in local workforce development activities.

Students with disabilities may find themselves accessing community college services and/or programs even if they intended to seek employment training rather than postsecondary education. Community colleges in many states are considered prime mechanisms for implementing state-supported workforce development and training under the Workforce Investment Act (WIA). Many state and local Workforce Investment Boards (WIBs) have community college representation, and in some cases the community colleges have primary responsibility at the local level for implementing WIA training programs or operating one stop centers. This means that students with disabilities, who are typically highly qualified for WIA youth and adult services, may receive services (traditional coursework or customized non-credit training) through a community college as a result of accessing a one stop career center or other WIA-funded services. For more information about WIA services through community colleges in your area, or to search for training and education resources in your community, go to America's Service Locator at http://www.servicelocator.org/.

BIBLIOGRAPHY AND REFERENCES

Chang, K., & Logan, J. (2002). A Comparison of Accommodations and Supports for Students with Disabilities in Two-year versus Four-Year Postsecondary Institutions. National Center for the Study of Postsecondary Educational Supports. [online].

College and Career Transitions Initiative (2003). Clearing the Path to Life's Work. League for Innovation in the Community College. [online].

Education Commission of the States Policy Brief (October, 2000). Building Bridges Not Barriers: Public Policies that Support Seamless K-12 Education). [online]. Available from http://www.communitycollegepolicy.org/html/publications_main.asp

ERIC Clearinghouse for Community Colleges (Spring 2003). Disabilities and the Community College: Topical Bibliography. [online].

Golden, T.P. & Jones, M. A. in Gaylord, V., Golden, T.P., O'Mara, S., and Johnson, D.R. (Eds.). (2002). Impact: Feature Issue on Young Adults with Disabilities & Social Security Administration Employment Support Programs, 15(1) [online]. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Institute on Community Integration. Available from http://ici.umn.edu/products/impact/151.

Grigal, M., Neubert, D. A., & Moon, M. S. (2001). Public School Programs for Students with Significant Disabilities in Post-secondary Settings. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 36 (3), 244-245.

Jenkins, D., & Boswell, K. (2002). State Policies on Community College Remedial Education: Findings from a National Survey. Education Commission of the States Policy Paper. [online]. Available from http://www.communitycollegepolicy.org/html/publications_main.asp

Moon, M. S., Grigal, M., & Neubert, D. (2001). High School and Beyond: Students with Significant Disabilities Complete High School Through Alternative Programs in Post-Secondary Settings, Exceptional Parent, July, 52-57.

National Center on Secondary Education and Transtion Parent Brief (March, 2002). Parenting Post-Secondary Students with Disabilities: Becoming the Mentor, Advocate, and Guide Your Young Adult Needs. [online]. Available from http://www.ncset.org/publications/viewdesc.asp?id=208.

Phelan, D.J. (2000). Enrollment Policies and Student Access at Community Colleges, Education Commission of the States Policy Paper. [online]. Available from http://www.communitycollegepolicy.org/html/publications_main.asp

Russman, Maxine (1999). Workforce Development Reform in Illinois: Implications for Community Colleges. Update on Research and Leadership, 10, (3). Office of Community College Research and Leadership. [online].

Savukinas, R. (2003). Community Colleges and Students with Disabilities, HEATH Resource Center. [online].

Stodden, R.A., & Jones, M.A. (2002). Supporting Youth with Disabilities to Access and Succeed in Postsecondary Education: Essentials for Educators in Secondary Schools. National Center on Secondary Education and Transition. [online]. Available from http://www.ncset.org/publications/viewdesc.asp?id=706

United States Department of Education, Office for Civil Rights (July, 2002). Students with Disabilities Preparing for Postsecondary Education: Know Your Rights and Responsibilities. [online]. Available from http://www.ed.gov/print/about/offices/list/ocr/transition.html

United States Department of Labor (July 11, 2003). Workforce Investment Act Operations Bulletin, 2, (26). [online]. Available from http://ows.doleta.gov/dmstree/wia/v2/2-26.htm



Printed from http://www.vacollegequest.org/choosing/continuing_issues.shtml
top